loading
Loading.loading
Loading.Buying more Claude (or Cursor) seats gets your team a better copilot — autocomplete and in-editor Q&A, roughly 10% of what these models can do. The jump to agents running real work in production is an operating problem, not a license: it needs durable context, observability, and developers trained to run fleets. You can absolutely try it in-house; tsukumo just gets you there faster than trial-and-error, in your environment.
Updated
| tsukumo | More Claude seats / staying in-house | |
|---|---|---|
| What you get | Agents running real work in production | Autocomplete and in-editor Q&A (the copilot floor) |
| The missing layer | Context, observability, operators — built in | Not in the license; you assemble it yourself |
| Path | A guided transition on your stack | DIY trial-and-error, on your own time |
| Risk | Guardrails and review gates your seniors trust | Ungoverned agent use, or stalling at autocomplete |
If you have a strong team with real slack to learn, tolerance for slow trial-and-error, and someone who'll own the operating layer, you can get there in-house — plenty of teams do. We're honest about that. We're worth it when you want to skip the trial-and-error and have the whole team operating agents sooner, in production.
or have us build it — same capability, the other door
Related answers